Receive an email notification when this blog is updated:

Journalists are welcome to use the information contained in this blog as long as they credit TheCorporateCounsel.net - contact Broc if you have any questions.

Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

June 19, 2013

Video Killed the Radio Star: Launch of My "Take Two" Videos

I've been wanting to get more into video for a long time. A really long time. And now that most of us have iPads and other devices attached to our hips, I am making that push with the launch of my regular series entitled "Take Two." The idea is very short videos - two minutes long (hence the series name) - on random topics, with the arthouse production of someone working out of their garage. In other words, for me to have fun - and hopefully you too. I'm sure my process and production will evolve as I experiment - so please feel free to share criticism, ideas and feedback.

My first episode is "BlackRock: Investor Gigante" - which gives you the gist of this recent NY Times article. A quick and dirty way to learn about the largest investor out there:

Are Severance Agreements Violating the SEC's Whistleblower Laws?

Jill Radloff of Leonard Street gives us this news via this blog:

Two partners from a self-described law firm that specializes in the representation of whistleblowers have sent a letter to the SEC Commissioners complaining about the use of severance agreements to prevent employees from participating in the SEC whistleblower program. The letter complains about contractual clauses inserted in severance agreements with departing employees such as:

- Employee agrees that he will not use or disclose any Company information at any time subsequent to the execution of the Agreement, except as required by law. Company information does not include information or knowledge which Employee is required to disclose by order of a governmental agency or court after timely notice of the order has been provided to the Company.
- Employee represents that he has not filed any lawsuit, claim, charge, or complaint regarding the Company with any local, state, or federal agency, self-regulatory organization, or court.
- Employee hereby irrevocably assigns to the federal government, or relevant state or local government, any right Employee may have to any proceeds, bounties or awards in connection with any claims filed by or on behalf of the government under any laws, including but not limited to, the False Claims Act and/or the Dodd-Frank Act (and/or any state or local counterparts of these federal statutes or any other federal, state or local qui tam or "bounty" statute) against the Company. Employee also represents and promises that Employee will deliver any such proceeds, bounties or awards to the United States government (or other appropriate governmental unit).
- Employee will inform the Company within ten (10) days of receipt of a subpoena or inquiry requesting information relating to the Company and will cooperate with the Company in any investigation, regulatory matter, arbitration and/or any third-party lawsuit in which the Company is a subject or party.

The letter requests the SEC issue a regulation or an opinion clarifying the breadth of actions that the SEC views as likely to "impede" communication with the SEC under the whistleblower program. The law firm believes this would stem the growth of what they believe is an apparent effort to discourage whistleblowers from providing information to the SEC.

Meanwhile, the SEC has made its second whistleblower award - memos on this development are being posted in our "Whistleblowers" Practice Area.

More on our "Proxy Season Blog"

We continue to post new items regularly on our "Proxy Season Blog" for TheCorporateCounsel.net members. Members can sign up to get that blog pushed out to them via email whenever there is a new entry by simply inputting their email address on the left side of that blog. Here are some of the latest entries:

- Harvard Hires Sustainable Investing VP
- Corp Fin: Lobbying Expenditure, Political Giving Not Duplicative
- Hewlett-Packard Directors Win Re-Election Despite Challenging Campaigns
- Proxy Season Preview: ESG Proposals - Part 2
- Divergent Corp Fin Decisions on Independent Chair Proposals
- Corp Fin Explains Analysis for Assessing Vague Shareholder Proposals Under (i)(3)

- Broc Romanek

June 18, 2013

More on "Survey Results: Rule 10b5-1 Plan Practices"

Last week, I ran this blog providing survey results on Rule 10b5-1 plans and received many emails in response. David Smyth of Brooks Pierce even blogged this analysis about them:

When I was on the SEC's enforcement staff, I had a case once where we were pretty sure our prospective defendant had engaged in insider trading. Our conversation with his lawyer went something like this:ยน

Us: Did your guy sell those shares on the basis of material, nonpublic information?

Him: No way. In fact, he had a 10b5-1 plan in place, and all of his sales were in accordance with that plan.

Us: Um, was that plan written down anywhere?

Him: No, it wasn't written down, but it doesn't have to be. If you look at the trading records, you'll see the trades followed a regular pattern.

Us: Hmmm. We've actually reviewed those records. It looks like the plan was to sell all his shares as quickly as possible so he could get out before the share price cratered, as he knew was going to happen.

We recommended that the Commission bring an enforcement action against this person for insider trading, which it did. We settled the matter soon afterward. But let me tell you, if this defendant's trading had followed a regular pattern, we wouldn't have touched that case with a ten-foot pole. Even if we suspected that he was selling only to avoid suffering from the imminent death of the company whose shares he owned, an actual 10b5-1 plan would have protected him. We would not have wanted to attack sales that were obviously covered by such a plan, because the court would have rightly handed us our heads.

Rule 10b5-1 plans work like this: if, before becoming aware of material, nonpublic information, a corporate insider (1) enters into a binding contract to trade the securities; (2) instructs another person to trade the securities for the insider's account; or (3) adopts a written plan for trading the securities, the trades are deemed not to be "on the basis of" that material, nonpublic information. The rule goes on in greater detail, but the gist is that the trader must not have discretion to adjust the trades once the information becomes known. If the plan is to sell 100 shares per month, the insider can't change that number to 10,000 when the draft of a horrendous quarterly earnings report is circulated to senior management but not yet to investors. But Rule 10b5-1 plans that are strictly followed are extremely strong defenses against insider trading charges.

Which is why it surprised me on Tuesday to see the results from Broc Romanek's survey on Rule 10b5-1 plan practices. None of the 35 companies responding to the survey require corporate insiders to sell shares pursuant to a 10b5-1 plan, and 68% of those companies do not explicitly encourage their use. I don't get this. It seems like such low-hanging corporate governance fruit to me to ask that senior executives cabin their trading in a way to minimize potential liability for themselves and their companies. Bruce Carton wrote a good piece in Compliance Week two years ago discussing the benefits of having a strong insider trading compliance program. They included:

- Avoiding control person liability for companies whose executives are found liable for insider trading;
- Protecting employees who don't understand the intricacies of insider trading law, which are complex; and
- Avoiding reputational damage and legal fees from disruptive investigations.

A Rule 10b5-1 plan, faithfully followed and not gamed for the insider's benefit, is one relatively easy way to avoid those things. I'm surprised that more companies are apparently not taking advantage of them.

1. Our actual conversation did not go like this. As we always did, we gathered facts in the investigation, and this "discussion" played out in the Wells process that followed.

And myStockOptions.com also covered the survey results in this blog...

SEC's Chief Accountant Discusses New COSO Framework

A few weeks ago, SEC Chief Accountant Paul Beswick gave this speech about the updated COSO framework in which he said that the SEC staff will monitor the transition for companies to evaluate whether any SEC become necessary. In the meantime, companies are free to refer to the new COSO framework.

Insights Into Forming Your Own Firm

In this podcast, Ben Lieber of Potomac Law Group provides some insight into what it's like to form your own law firm, including:

- What led you to create your own firm?
- What is the firm's business model?
- How much corporate governance/corporate work does the firm do?
- Any surprises in making this leap?

- Broc Romanek

June 17, 2013

Juicy Lawsuit Pays Off for Reinstated SEC Assistant Inspector General: $580k!

As I blogged six months ago, SEC Assistant Inspector General David Weber filed a $20 million lawsuit alleging he was fired for being a whistleblower (you may recall the complaint was full of juicy details, which may - or may not - be true). Last week, it was reported that Weber received a settlement of $580k for the lawsuit - as well as his job back and his record cleansed. That is pretty big number for a government settlement. Learn more in "Sex, Lies, Stupidity, Oh My!!: SEC Whistleblower David Weber Vindicated, Receives Huge $ettlement" (and this Reuters article and Washington Post article).

The SEC's RiskFin Becomes DERA...

The SEC does some rebranding. As noted in this press release, the agency renamed Division of Risk, Strategy, and Financial Innovation (commonly known as "RiskFin") to the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis. The Division was first created in '09 - and its size and importance has dramatically increased since formation, primarily due to the intense scrutiny of the economic analysis given to rulemakings throughout the federal government. So what is the Division's new nickname? DERA?

Economic Analysis of Rulemaking: SEC's Inspector General Issues Two Final Reports

With economic analysis of rulemaking continuing to be a hot topic in the wake of the court case striking down the SEC's proxy access rules - legislation in this area is still pending - the SEC's IG office issued two reports last week. This report is the final one evaluating the SEC's current use of guidance on economic analysis and contains six recommendations. This report is the final one evaluating the SEC's implementation of this guidance and contains one recommendation. The evaluations were conducted per Congressional request.

- Broc Romanek

June 14, 2013

Sights of the NIRI Conference

Here are a few pics from the NIRI conference. This first one is a pic of a monitor set up in the hallway, which displayed graphics created by Marketwired of how many folks were tweeting at the conference during any given hour. Data visualization baby! A lot of people did tweet - sometimes at a clip of several hundred per hour. In fact, it was not uncommon to see folks holding up their phones and taking pictures of the panel or PowerPoint and then tweeting them. Never seen that before - but I joined the party and even took a pic of the audience and tweeted it while I was speaking:

niri market.jpg

Here is a cool give-away - Say-on-Pay T-shirt - from Laurel Hill:

niri sop.jpg

The conference registration desk featured Randall, the Honey Badger. My wife said "get me that" but it wasn't a give-away unfortunately:

niri mascot.jpg

In the exhibit hall, Wells Fargo went all out:

niri wells.jpg

And the best for last, the after-party hosted by LiquidNet (invitation only - need a wristband):

niri liquidnet.jpg

- Broc Romanek

June 13, 2013

Former SEC Commissioner Weighs In: Unburnable Assets

From Lynn Turner: This is a fascinating - and startling - presentation made recently to students at the New School University in NY. Bevis Longstreth is a former SEC Commissioner, a successful investor, and former partner of Debevoise & Plimpton. The presentation notes that if current reserves of fossil fuels held on the balance sheets of oil, gas and mining companies are burned, the world simply cannot survive the global warming as we understand it today. Yet if those reserves are not allowed to be burned, the market capitalization of these companies - currently $4 trillion - will decline 40-60% with sharp losses to investors. It poses the question, what if anything, is the SEC doing to require disclosure to investors in this regard and proper reporting of such reserves?

As noted at the end of the presentation, important material for it comes from The Carbon Tracker Initiative's report: "Unburnable Carbon 2013: Wasted Capital and Stranded Assets."

Who Should Actually Have Say on Pay?

This article from the Harvard Business Review is one of the best I have read on say-on-pay in terms of the "big picture"...

Google's CEO & Disclosure of Health Issues

As noted in this Bloomberg article, Google recently revealed that its CEO Larry Page suffers from a health condition that can result in hoarse speech and labored breathing, though according to doctors won't impede him from running the company. This disclosure was made through a blog posting. So far, I haven't heard any complaints about Google's disclosure (nor should there be IMHO) - unlike the fracas over the health of Apple's Steve Jobs as noted in this blog.

Have trouble sleeping at night? According to this article, you are not alone. Bernie Madoff can't sleep either...

- Broc Romanek

June 12, 2013

Will the SEC Really Bring More Financial Fraud Cases?

Over on the "Mentor Blog," I recently blogged about "New SEC Software Identifies Potential Fraud." And I've been reading how the new SEC Chair is bringing in other prosecutors to work on the Staff (here's the latest). So it was interesting to read this DealBook article - which first caught my eye due to its catchy title - about how Chair White intends to bring more financial fraud cases. Only 79 such cases were brought during the most recent fiscal year. Learn more in David Smyth's blog.

From the Staff's perspective, financial fraud cases are a real bear. They chew up a lot of resources and require special expertise as an accounting background is necessary for some members of the investigatory team. Unlike insider trader cases - which often can be a slam dunk - financial fraud cases typically take years to bring, rather than months. And since the SEC tends to be graded - by Congress and the media - by how many cases it brings, financial fraud cases are mainly a lot of risk and little reward for the agency. So it will be interesting to see if the SEC's approach does change and how it goes about pulling it off...

The One Word That Shouldn't Exist in an Entrepreneur's Vocabulary

Speaking of lessons learned, this blog by Mark Suster in "Both Sides of the Table" is fantastic. Share it with your loved ones and colleagues. It's all about "You don't ask, you don't get," which might sound trite in isolation - but Mark is such a wonderful story teller that he brings the concept to life...

Rare Study: CEO Evaluations

In this podcast, Professor Dave Larcker discusses his new study - conducted jointly by the Center for Leadership Development and Research at Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University's Rock Center for Corporate Governance and The Miles Group - about the annual evaluations that boards give their CEOs, including:

- How hard was it to find information about CEO evaluations?
- What were the findings that didn't surprise you?
- What were the most surprising findings?
- Why do you think boards are not pressuring CEOs to do a better job in mentoring talent?

- Broc Romanek

June 11, 2013

Survey Results: Rule 10b5-1 Plan Practices

We have posted these survey results on Rule 10b5-1 plan practices:

1. Does your company require insiders to sell shares only pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan?
- Yes, insiders are required to use Rule 10b5-1 plans in order to sell shares - 0%
- No, but they are strongly encouraged - 31%
- No, and they are not explicitly encouraged - 69%
- Not sure, it hasn't come up - 0%

2. Does your company review and approve each insider's Rule 10b5-1 trading plan?
- Yes, it is subject to prior review and approval by the company pursuant to the insider trading policy - 91%
n=2 (5.88%) Yes, but only the template plan is reviewed and not the actual trading schedule - 6%
- No, but we have a broker that we require to be used and have reviewed that brokers template - 0%
- No, and there is no requirement to go through a specific broker - 3%

3. Does your company allow sales of shares through Rule 10b5-1 trading plans during blackout periods?
- Yes - 91%
- No - 3%
- Not sure, it hasn't come up - 6%

4. Does your company require a waiting period between execution of Rule 10b5-1 trading plans and time of first sale?
- Yes, it is a two week waiting period or less - 15%
- Yes, it is a one month waiting period (or close to it) - 44%
- Yes, it is a two month waiting period (or close to it) - 12%
- Yes, it is a waiting period until the next open window - 12%
- No - 18%
- Not sure, it hasn't come up - 0%

5. Does your company allow insiders to voluntarily terminate a Rule 10b5-1 plan?
- Yes - 82%
- No, only terminations dictated by the trading plan are allowed - 18%

6. Does your company make public disclosure of the insiders' Rule 10b5-1 trading plans?
- Yes, but only for directors and/or one or more officers - 15%
- Yes, for all directors and employees - 6%
- No - 79%

7. If your company makes public disclosure, how does it do it?
- Form 8-K - 50%
- Press release - 8%
- Website posting - 8%
- Combination of above - 8%
- Other - 25%

Please take a moment to participate in this "Quick Survey on Loan Prohibitions & Cashless Exercises" and "Quick Survey on Lead Directors."

Relief Granted! Treasury Subsidiaries of Non-Financial Companies

Recently, I blogged about the dire need for relief from the CFTC over an unintended consequence of Dodd-Frank. Good news! In this no-action letter, the CFTC Staff granted that relief (learn more in this Davis Polk memo)...

Webcast: "Proxy Season Post-Mortem: The Latest Compensation Disclosures"

Tune in tomorrow for the CompensationStandards.com webcast - "Proxy Season Post-Mortem: The Latest Compensation Disclosures" - to hear Mark Borges of Compensia, Dave Lynn of CompensationStandards.com and Morrison & Foerster and Ron Mueller of Gibson Dunn analyze what was (and what was not) disclosed this proxy season.

- Broc Romanek

June 10, 2013

Our New "Form 10-K Handbook"

Spanking brand new. Posted in our "Form 10-K" Practice Area, this comprehensive "Form 10-K Handbook" provides a heap of practical guidance about how to deal with Form 10-K. This one is a real gem - 41 pages of practical guidance.

In our "Conflict Minerals" Practice Area, I've been posting oodles of memos on the SEC's FAQs on conflict minerals - including this one from Jeffrey Rubin entitled "The Conflict Minerals Rules: Do They Reach Subsidiaries?"...

The Dangers of Social Media: The SEC's Enforcement Division Is Social Too

Here's news from Vince Pisano of Xtract Research: Recently, the SEC commenced an action for insider trading against an investor in Thailand who purchased common stock, out of the money call options, and single stock futures on common stock of Smithfield Foods in the week before the announcement of its acquisition by Shuanghui International Holdings. The SEC alleged that the investor was tipped to an impending transaction by a Facebook friend, who was a former employee at the investor's employer and is now employed by an investment bank that counseled a competing bidder. In eight days, the investor reaped unrealized gains of $3.2 million on an investment of approximately $2.7 million. The investor's purchases of options and single stock futures were so large, they constituted almost the entire market. Perhaps he thought no one would notice.

Since the investor is said to be an employee of a plastics factory in Thailand, either additional persons will be soon be implicated or applications for jobs at Thailand plastics factories will soar. The regulators were obviously drawn to this investor by the size of his positions - but notably, the only connection to inside information alleged in the SEC's complaint is to a Facebook friend. First emails and now social media sites. The SEC has computers and knows how to use them.

In this blog, David Smyth notes how quickly the SEC's Enforcement staff brought this action - which involves the largest-ever acquisition of a U.S. company by a Chinese company...

Webcast: "A Proxy Season Post-Mortem: Lessons Learned"

Tune in tomorrow for the webcast - "A Proxy Season Post-Mortem: Lessons Learned"- to hear Ning Chiu of Davis Polk; Marty Dunn of O'Melveny & Myers; Keir Gumbs of Covington & Burling; and Dave Lynn of TheCorporateCounsel.net & Morrison & Forester analyze the latest developments that transpired during the proxy season.

- Broc Romanek

June 7, 2013

Now 42 Say-on-Pay Failures This Year - Including Two More Three-Peats!

There have been a dozen more failures during the past few days, including three more companies that have failed two years in a row - and two more have failed three years in a row! At three-peater Nabor Industries, two comp committee members failed to receive majority support and tendered their resignations, which were not accepted by the board - and as noted in this WSJ article, the company engaged in some shady vote counting on its proxy access proposal. Wow...

Here are the latest failures:

- Nabors Industries - Form 8-K (33%; also failed in 2012 with 25% and in 2011 with 42%)
- OpenTable - Form 8-K (47%)
- Big Lots - Form 8-K (31%; also failed in 2012 with 31%)
- East West Bancorp - Form 8-K (42%)
- Tutor Perini - Form 8-K (38%; a 3-peat with 38% in 2012, 49% in 2011)
- The Children's Place Retail Stores - Form 8-K (17%)
- Gleacher & Company - Form 8-K (39%)
- Insite Vision - Form 8-K (38%; also failed in 2012 at 49%)
- Radioshack - Form 8-K (46%)
- Delcath Systems - Form 8-K (49% support)
- Equal Energy - Form 8-K (44% support)
- Healthways - Form 8-K (32% support; failed in 2012 with 33% support)
- Hercules Technology Growth Capital - Form 8-K (49%)

Thanks to Karla Bos of ING for the heads up on these! Also check out this Towers Watson article entitled "Smaller Companies Seeing More Say-on-Pay Failures."

Loving this slow motion swimming video. A terrific sport...

More on "Confusion Reigns: Dealing with the New Independence of Advisors Requirement"

I told you that I could blog about this topic every day (hence this upcoming CompensationStandards.com webcast - "Law Firms & Independence: What to Do Now"). Here's a note that I received from a member:

As the July 1st deadline approaches, advisers to companies, particularly outside legal counsel, and board compensation committees have been focusing on what it means to "provide advice" as contemplated by the Instruction to Rule 10C-1(b)(4). The Securities Law Committee of the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals reported in a Society Alert that this question was discussed recently at its regular meeting with the Staff of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance. At this meeting, Tom Kim, the Division's Chief Counsel, clarified an informal Staff response to a question raised at the beginning of the month on how to determine whether a company's outside legal counsel (or other outside adviser) was indirectly "providing advice" to a compensation committee. He indicated that, while the question does not lend itself to a "bright line" test, in-house legal counsel should be in the best position to make the determination and control the vetting process. For example, if in-house legal counsel has a lawyer outside the door of the compensation committee meeting and goes out and gets advice and then comes back in and transmits that advice, then obviously that adviser should have been vetted. He called this the "ventriloquist" scenario.

On the other hand, if in-house legal counsel speaks to several outside legal counsel as a matter of course and then is in a compensation committee meeting giving advice based on what he or she has heard and formulated in his or her own mind, this situation would not require that these counsel be vetted.

For everything else - including the more realistic scenario of in-house legal counsel talking to one outside law firm on a regular basis - it is up to the company to use its judgment as to whether, based on the relevant facts and circumstances, a party is providing advice to the compensation committee and, thus, an independence assessment is required.

Transcript: "FCPA Issues in Deals Today"

We have posted the transcript for the DealLawyers.com webcast: "FCPA Issues in Deals Today."

- Broc Romanek

June 6, 2013

Getting a Facelift: The SEC's New Edgar Search Page

Last week, I was excited to see the SEC's new Edgar search page, the first facelift for the page in a decade. For example, check out the beta view for company filings - here is Capital One as an example.

The display is much nicer than the old search tool. The upgrade begins to overcome one of my long-standing complaints - obscure nomenclature for the form names - since the form description is easily viewed (although there is still room for improvement, eg. a proxy statement is described as "Other definitive proxy statements" - and the form types still aren't intuitive to a typical investor, eg. DEF 14A). Overall, the upgrade gets a "groovy" grade!

The new page's tagline of "Free access to more than 20 million filings" reminds me of the old days of McDonald's marketing campaign of "X million served"...

You Ever Wonder What Annual Shareholder Meetings Look Like?

In case you have never seen an annual shareholder meeting before, The National Center for Public Policy Research has posted videos for some of the 32 meetings this year that it has presented as a proponent. It also has posted press releases for each of those meetings, explaining what it's activist position is for each company.

We have two post-mortem webcasts on the proxy season next week. On Tuesday, there is this one for non-pay issues on this site - and on Wednesday, there is one for executive pay issues on CompensationStandards.com. Tune in!

More on our "Proxy Season Blog"

We continue to post new items regularly on our "Proxy Season Blog" for TheCorporateCounsel.net members. Members can sign up to get that blog pushed out to them via email whenever there is a new entry by simply inputting their email address on the left side of that blog. Here are some of the latest entries:

- Big Banks Beat Back "Break 'Em Up" Shareholder Proposals
- ISS, Notices of Exempt Solicitation and HP
- Proxy Season Preview: ESG Proposals
- Declassified Boards: Shareholder Rights Project's Results for '13
- Lead Directors: Limited to Serve Only At One Board In That Capacity
- Disney's Proxy Access Shareholder Proposal Doesn't Pass

- Broc Romanek