I’ve had the flu so I’ve been doing a bit of reading, including David Halberstam’s excellent book “The Fifties.” Reading about McCarthyism is always so shocking – yet it feels like the same type of unsubstantiated witch hunts could easily take place today. For example, I was surprised to find out – as noted in this Huffington Post piece – that the FBI was tracking the Occupy movement even before it got off the ground. That’s where our tax dollars are going? So I guess it’s not too far-fetched to ask if the FBI is checking on shareholder proponents too? Love to see the dossier on Evelyn Y. Davis…
EU Commission Proposes ’13 Action Plan for Company Law and Corporate Governance
In mid-December, as noted in this memo, the European Commission published an Action Plan with initiatives it intends to undertake in 2013 in the fields of EU company law and corporate governance. These initiatives are primarily inspired by the responses to the Commission’s 2011 Green Paper on the EU corporate governance framework and an on-line consultation on the future of European company law. They are aimed at enhancing transparency, engaging shareholders and simplifying cross-border operations of EU companies. The Commission further plans to codify a number of major EU company law directives.
Subodh Mishra of ISS’s Governance Exchange notes:
The action plan comes in response to a 2010 “green paper” on corporate governance that in turn stemmed from concerns over governance failing evidenced during the recent financial crisis. The plan effectively details initiatives regulators will take to “modernize” corporate governance with a focus on enhancing corporate transparency and empowering investors to be better stewards.
Key plans to implement E.U.-level changes include:
– A proposal in 2013 to “strengthen” corporate disclosure requirements with regard to board diversity policies and risk management through amendment of the E.U. directive on accounting;
– Improving the visibility of shareholdings in listed companies whereby beneficial owners could be identified would be addressed in 2013 through securities legislation;
– Improving the quality of corporate governance reports and in particular the quality of explanations which should be provided by listed companies that depart from the corporate governance code provisions could be addressed through a non-legislative initiative in 2013; and
– Disclosure of voting and engagement policies as well as voting records by institutional investors, improving transparency on remuneration policies and individual remuneration of directors, granting shareholders the right to vote on the remuneration policy, and improving shareholder control over related-party transactions could be addressed in 2013 through the shareholder rights’ directive.
Reaction to proposed initiates has largely been muted as interested parties wait on further details. The proposals, moreover, are largely in line with best practice guidance in the U.K. while elements of the action plan – such as mandatory say-on-pay voting – are prevalent in other European capital markets.
Mailed: November-December Issue of “The Corporate Executive”
We have mailed the November-December Issue of The Corporate Executive and it includes pieces on:
– Defining “Pay” in “Pay-for-Performance:” The Rise of Alternative Pay Measures for 2013
– Update: Proposed Regs Under Section 162(m)
– Rev. Rul. Clarifies Treatment of Dividends Under Section 162(m)
– Deferred Tax Accounting for Companies in the Red
Comic book aficionados love the “what if” scenarios. For example, what if Conan battled Thor? Anyways, as noted in this Financial Times article, ValueAct Capital, an activist hedge fund, disclosed last month a 5% stake in MSCI, which owns ISS. What do you think the potential consequences could be if they increased their holdings to a controlling position? Is this different than Glass Lewis being owned by the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan?
Another Day, Another Judge Challenges a SEC Enforcement Settlement
The courts continue to pose one of the biggest threats to the SEC’s ability to do its job. As noted in this DealBook piece, Judge Richard Leon of the Federal District Court in DC has held up a FCPA settlement for nearly two years because of his demands for greater disclosure.
Escheatment: SEC Approves New Rules Regarding Lost Holders of Securities
As noted in this “Dodd-Frank Blog” by Ethan Mark of Leonard Street, the SEC has adopted rules applying the same type of escheatment procedures to brokers as it does to transfer agents.
Saw the first mentions of a rumor that Enforcement Director Rob Khuzami would soon be leaving the SEC last night. And now most of the major media outlets are reporting the same – including the WSJ and Bloomberg. If he does indeed leave, that would mean three Director departures out of the four major Divisions within a few short weeks (and remember that the SEC is working with an “Acting” Chief Accountant – and the IM Director turned over just six months ago)! Here is the ten cents that I recently blogged about whether all these senior Staff departures are normal after an election…
The Fiscal Cliff: How Many at the SEC Will Be Furloughed?
Hopefully this will be my last blog of this year – trying a blog vacation next week – and with the fiscal cliff looming, the federal agencies are gearing up for the consequences. Furloughs galore. See this Washington Post article and this Government Executive piece.
Last Sunday, the New York Times Magazine included this comparison of the Securities & Exchange Commission and the Southeastern Conference, one of the major collegiate sports conferences:
Hat tip to Dan Pliskin for reminding me about it!
First Attempt to Kill the Shareholder Proposal Rule? Early 1943
In the wake of my blog wishing a happy 70th birthday to Rule 14a-8, a member sent this fascinating New York Times article dated January 24, 1943, providing details of a Senate bill designed to kill the new shareholder proposal rule – the one that had just been adopted the month before! It seeks to revoke the SEC’s power to regulate proxies during wartime – with an amendment sought that all regulations prescribed by the SEC after November 1, 1942 be wiped out. Things were more radical back then that I thought…
ISS’ ExecComp Analytics
In this CompensationStandards.com podcast, Mark Brockway of ISS Corporate Services discusses the latest developments related to ISS’ executive compensation analytic services, ExecComp Analytics, including:
– What is ExecComp Analytics?
– What was your goal in creating it?
– Any surprises so far since it went live?
PCAOB’s New Staff Audit Practice Alert: Professional Skepticism in Audits
A few weeks ago, the PCAOB published a Staff Audit Practice Alert #10 to remind auditors of their requirement to exercise professional skepticism throughout their audits. On its face, the fact that the PCAOB published an alert to tell auditors to do their job speaks volumes. It begs the question – why aren’t auditors already skeptical? I’m not convinced issuing an alert will do much by itself…
Nasdaq has just filed an amendment to its proposed rules relating to compensation committee independence and consultants. The change addresses a troublesome timing problem with the original proposal.
Proposed Rule 5605(d)(3) states that a compensation committee must have the specific responsibilities and authority necessary to comply with Rule 10C-1(b)(2), (3) and (4)(i)-(vi) under the Exchange Act relating to the retention, compensation, oversight and funding of compensation consultants, legal counsel and other compensation advisers, and is required to consider the six independence factors enumerated in Rule 10C-1(b)(4) before selecting, or receiving advice from, these advisers. Originally, these provisions – that is, requiring that the committee be granted the specific authority and responsibility referenced in Rule 5605(d)(3) — were to have become immediately effective upon approval of the Nasdaq proposal by the SEC, creating some implementation and coordination problems. Under the amended proposal, Rule 5605(d)(3) will become effective on July 1, 2013; by that date, the committee’s authority and responsibility under Rule 5605(d)(3) must be reflected in the committee charter, resolutions or other board action, as permitted by state law. (Ultimately, the authority and responsibility under Rule 5605(d)(3) must be included in the charter in accordance with the regular transition schedule for these rules.) In addition, under the amendment, Nasdaq proposes that companies comply with the remaining provisions of the amended listing rules by the earlier of (1) their first annual meeting after January 15, 2014 or (2) October 31, 2014. This revision is consistent with the NYSE proposal.
Also notable in the amendment is the express deletion of the word “independent” prior to “legal counsel” to make clear that only in-house counsel are excluded from the requirement to consider independence. In addition, the original proposal discussed the committee’s need to consider the six independence factors in “making an independence determination” regarding compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisers. In the amendment, the concept of an “independence determination” has been deleted, with the reference now only to the need to consider the six factors before selecting, or receiving advice from, these advisers. The deletion may have been intended to emphasize that the committee “is not required to retain an independent compensation adviser.” The addition of the phrase “receiving advice from” makes clear that the analysis cannot be avoided simply by not “selecting” an advisor.
The amendment also proposes changes to the phase-in schedule for companies ceasing to be Smaller Reporting Companies, allowing these companies six months, in lieu of the originally proposed 30 days, to certify that they have adopted a formal compensation committee charter. These companies will also be permitted, under the amendment, to phase in fully compliant compensation committees.
The proposed form of compensation committee certification is now attached to the amendment to the proposal. The certification will be due 30 days after the final implementation deadline applicable to the company.
Meanwhile, Ning Chiu of Davis Polk analyzes the 15 comment letters submitted on the Nasdaq’s and NYSE’s proposals in this blog…
Lona Nallengara Tapped as Acting Corp Fin Director
Yesterday, the SEC announced that Lona Nallengara has been named as Corp Fin’s Acting Director, replacing Meredith Cross until a permanent Director is found. In addition, John Ramsay was named Acting Director of the Division of Trading and Markets.
Happy Birthday to the SEC’s Shareholder Proposal Rule!
The precursor to today’s Rule 14a-8 was adopted 70 years ago today…
Board Oversight of Compliance
In this podcast, Jeff Kaplan of Kaplan & Walker explains the latest developments in how boards oversee compliance programs, including:
– What are the important legal drivers for board oversight of compliance programs?
– Can you provide an overview of board oversight of compliance programs – meaning what sort of information they should receive?
– Can you describe more about what you called the operational type of information?
– Is there the same type of variation in what you called the case-specific type of information that a board gets?
– How does a company make all this happen? Is the starting point with governance documentation?
Here’s how this article entitled “How the SEC Almost Shut Down Wall Street” begins:
Sensitive, confidential information belonging to major U.S. stock exchanges was at risk of being hacked, according to a new Reuters report. Securities and Exchange Commission Interim Inspector General Jon Rymer wrote in a 43-page report that some SEC staffers had used unprotected government computers at a Black Hat convention this year. This convention attracts hundreds of hacking experts who bring seemingly impenetrable devices with them to see if they can be cracked, says Adam Levin, chairman and cofounder of Credit.com. The SEC said the government-issued computers were not hacked and no unauthorized breach of data occured. According to Reuters, the SEC employees attending the conference had logged into the unencrypted computers through public wireless networks.
The Inspector General said the employees, who had worked in the SEC’s Trading and Markets division, were no longer at the federal agency. The SEC has been warning Wall Street firms and and market exchanges to beef up their cyber security efforts. But the government computers brought to the Black Hat convention did not have basic virus protection programs installed and the employees had neglected to encrypt the devices, Reuters reports.
And this Reuters article notes that the NYSE has hired former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to make sure sensitive exchange data was not breached after securities regulators left their computers unencrypted.
In this podcast, Greg Dickinson of Hiperos discusses the latest developments in FCPA compliance, including:
– What does Hiperos do?
– How does your platform allow companies to facilitate forming their FCPA compliance programs?
– Any surprises in creating that platform?
– What do you see in 2013 as far as DOJ enforcement of the FCPA is concerned?
– What about the regulatory environment in general?
Heard Peter Coyote talk about the plight of wrongly imprisoned Leonard Peltier and it’s sad that this country still can’t get it right when it comes to freedom. Please sign this petition for clemency as he is in poor health and already served 37 years for something he didn’t do…
FCPA Regulators Speak on Newly Released FCPA Guidance
Here are notes from Morrison & Foerster from a recent conference where SEC and DOJ Staffers spoke about the new joint FCPA guidance (and here is Morgan Lewis’ memo on the same topic)…
Back in May, I blogged about the madness in the SEC’s Inspector General’s Office. The David Kotz and David Weber show. A soap opera at the SEC like this comes along only once every few generations!
The latest is that former Assistant Inspector General Weber has filed a $20 million lawsuit alleging he was fired for being a whistleblower. And the complaint is full of juicy details (which may – or may not – be true). Here are some articles on this development:
As a U. of Michigan grad, I’m very excited about their hoops team this year – particularly our Canadian freshman Nik Stauskas. Here is a video of what he did for Thanksgiving. Unbelievable talent and dedication…
PCAOB Issues Report on the State of Internal Controls
A few days ago, the PCAOB released a report summarizing observations from its inspections of audits performed by the 8 largest public accounting firms of their clients’ internal control over financial reporting in 2010. As noted in this blog by the FEI, there is a concern over the increasing rate of deficiencies – up to 22% in ’11 from 15% in ’10.
In this podcast, Abram Ellis of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett explains the latest developments relating to Iran sanctions and disclosure, including
– How do the recent changes to the U.S.’s economic sanctions related to Iran implicates disclosures?
– What does it mean when you say an issuer must report the activities of affiliates? What’s included in that?
– What types of activities need to be disclosed?
– How detailed do the disclosures need to be?
– Anything else we should know about the disclosure requirements?