April 1, 2014
Survey: Venture-Backed IPO Practices
2013 was the strongest year for venture-backed IPOs in almost a decade: 82 deals (the most since 2007) generated aggregate proceeds of over $11.2 billion, an average offering amount of $137.2 million. At least one venture-backed company went public each month in 2013, and the pace of IPOs has accelerated in the first three months of 2014. Here’s a venture-backed IPO survey for 2013 from Gunderson Dettmer, focusing on key governance and disclosure items.
Among others, the findings include:
– All but two of the 71 companies reviewed were incorporated in Delaware
– 35% were listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, 30% on the NYSE, – 28% on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, and 7% on the Nasdaq Capital Market
– Average time from incorporation to IPO was over 9 years
– Average time from initial registration statement submission to the SEC to pricing the IPO was 5months
– 33% of the companies have already completed follow-on offerings, frequently prior to the expiration of the 180-day IPO lock-up period
– Over 90% of venture-backed companies took advantage of the JOBS Act accommodation to submit a registration statement confidentially, spending on average 3 months in confidential registration and filing registration statement publicly 1 month before their roadshow
– Nearly half of venture-backed companies still provided 3 years of audited financials, but over 66% provide 3 or less years of selected financial information.
– Significant majority provided limited executive compensation information
– Despite the JOBS Act accommodation, a significant majority of venture-backed companies choose to be subject to new public company GAAP
Wife tells husband: “don’t trade on my confidential information.” Husband does it anyways. Husband gets caught by SEC. Repeat.
Webcast: “Rural/Metro and Claims for Aiding & Abetting Breaches of Fiduciary Duty”
Tune in tomorrow for the DealLawyers.com webcast – “Rural/Metro and Claims for Aiding & Abetting Breaches of Fiduciary Duty” – to hear Kevin Miller of Alston & Bird; Brad Davey of Potter Anderson; Stephen Bigler of Richards Layton, Stephen Kotran of Sullivan & Cromwell and Bill Lafferty of Morris Nichols as they discuss a case expected to have a dramatic impact on the viability of claims for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with M&A transactions. Please print these course materials in advance…
Our April Eminders is Posted!
We have posted the April issue of our complimentary monthly email newsletter. Sign up today to receive it by simply inputting your email address!
– Broc Romanek